<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rochester&#8217;s New Logo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tylerkieft.com/archives/2007/03/07/rochesters-new-logo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tylerkieft.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Ftylerkieft.com%2Farchives%2F2007%2F03%2F07%2Frochesters-new-logo%2F&amp;seed_title=Rochester%26%238217%3Bs+New+Logo</link>
	<description>Living Down Under</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 21:34:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tyler</title>
		<link>http://tylerkieft.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Ftylerkieft.com%2Farchives%2F2007%2F03%2F07%2Frochesters-new-logo%2F&amp;seed_title=Rochester%26%238217%3Bs+New+Logo#comment-995</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 01:24:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://snier.com/archives/2007/03/07/rochesters-new-logo/#comment-995</guid>
		<description>On second thought, I agree that the coloring is off in the first logo's text.  Rochester should be blue, not black and grey.  The text on the second one is closer to what we have now, which I like.  Also, the first one looks really out of proportion - the text size doesn't fit the shield size.  Hopefully there will be a clear winner in the voting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On second thought, I agree that the coloring is off in the first logo&#8217;s text.  Rochester should be blue, not black and grey.  The text on the second one is closer to what we have now, which I like.  Also, the first one looks really out of proportion - the text size doesn&#8217;t fit the shield size.  Hopefully there will be a clear winner in the voting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sadie</title>
		<link>http://tylerkieft.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Ftylerkieft.com%2Farchives%2F2007%2F03%2F07%2Frochesters-new-logo%2F&amp;seed_title=Rochester%26%238217%3Bs+New+Logo#comment-981</link>
		<dc:creator>Sadie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 23:08:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://snier.com/archives/2007/03/07/rochesters-new-logo/#comment-981</guid>
		<description>I totally agree with you.  I chose the second one because of the shield too.  I like the retangle-ness of the first one, but I don't like that it's two different colors.  I also like that the font in the second one is bold.  Odd that I had the same initial reaction as you did.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree with you.  I chose the second one because of the shield too.  I like the retangle-ness of the first one, but I don&#8217;t like that it&#8217;s two different colors.  I also like that the font in the second one is bold.  Odd that I had the same initial reaction as you did.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
