<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rochester&#8217;s New Logo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tylerkieft.com/archives/2007/03/07/rochesters-new-logo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tylerkieft.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Ftylerkieft.com%2Farchives%2F2007%2F03%2F07%2Frochesters-new-logo%2F&amp;seed_title=Rochester%26%238217%3Bs+New+Logo</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 19:52:11 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tyler</title>
		<link>http://tylerkieft.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Ftylerkieft.com%2Farchives%2F2007%2F03%2F07%2Frochesters-new-logo%2F&amp;seed_title=Rochester%26%238217%3Bs+New+Logo/comment-page-1/#comment-995</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 01:24:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://snier.com/archives/2007/03/07/rochesters-new-logo/#comment-995</guid>
		<description>On second thought, I agree that the coloring is off in the first logo&#039;s text.  Rochester should be blue, not black and grey.  The text on the second one is closer to what we have now, which I like.  Also, the first one looks really out of proportion - the text size doesn&#039;t fit the shield size.  Hopefully there will be a clear winner in the voting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On second thought, I agree that the coloring is off in the first logo&#8217;s text.  Rochester should be blue, not black and grey.  The text on the second one is closer to what we have now, which I like.  Also, the first one looks really out of proportion &#8211; the text size doesn&#8217;t fit the shield size.  Hopefully there will be a clear winner in the voting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sadie</title>
		<link>http://tylerkieft.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Ftylerkieft.com%2Farchives%2F2007%2F03%2F07%2Frochesters-new-logo%2F&amp;seed_title=Rochester%26%238217%3Bs+New+Logo/comment-page-1/#comment-981</link>
		<dc:creator>Sadie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 23:08:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://snier.com/archives/2007/03/07/rochesters-new-logo/#comment-981</guid>
		<description>I totally agree with you.  I chose the second one because of the shield too.  I like the retangle-ness of the first one, but I don&#039;t like that it&#039;s two different colors.  I also like that the font in the second one is bold.  Odd that I had the same initial reaction as you did.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree with you.  I chose the second one because of the shield too.  I like the retangle-ness of the first one, but I don&#8217;t like that it&#8217;s two different colors.  I also like that the font in the second one is bold.  Odd that I had the same initial reaction as you did.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
